If Judge Walker should have recused himself . . .

. . . as the numbskulls on the Yes on 8 legal team are whinging, then:

No woman should ever be allowed to rule on a case dealing with gender discrimination.

No person of color should ever be allowed to rule on a case regarding racism.

No divorced person should be allowed to rule on a divorce case.

No parent should be allowed to rule on a child custody case.

No crime victim should be allowed to rule on a criminal case.

There is nothing but positive news from this last pathetic pot shot from the bigots opposing marriage equality. Figuratively, this is the equivalent of losing a poetry competition to William Shakespeare and then being able to do nothing in response but point and splutter, “YEAH WELL YOUR GAY.”

Oh, wait. It’s not figurative at all.

3 thoughts on “If Judge Walker should have recused himself . . .

  1. Let’s face it, if a gay judge is ineligible to rule because being gay prejudices him/her, then doesn’t being straight, in a case where the majority straight population is trying to deprive gay Americans of a basic civil right, prejudice the straight judge?

  2. Somewhere, there’s a Supreme Court Justice snorting into a bowl of bran cereal. I actually hope this does make it to the Supreme Court so we can finally put this baby to bed.
    The only thing that would suck is that Oaks would have a lot more whining to do about the growing restrictions of religious freedom. Even though this is a civil rights issue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s